Workshop
and Public Hearing on Women's Right
to Own and Inherit Property in the
Luo community- Nyanza Province
In
response to the request for community
based interventions at the Nakuru
workshop, the Kenya National Commission
on Human Rights and the POLICY Project
decide to facilitate consultative
forums, between Stakeholders, within
the different communities of Kenya
at the cultural level for discussions
on this problem.This would create
the opportunity of trying the project
on the ground.
They elected to begin with the Luo
Community in Nyanza province given
the community's existing cultural
structure, the effect of HIV/ AIDs
on this community and the existing
network of groups that have expressed
a need for intervention on behalf
of widows in the community. They
identified Jaramogi Oginga Odinga
Foundation (JOOF) as the community
partner to move this initiative
with. JOOF is one of the organisations
that have previously been at the
forefront in moving initiatives
on advocacy strategies on HIV/AIDS
within the Luo community.
The
initiative begun with a workshop,
for a few selected stakeholders
from representative groups namely
widows and orphans ( including HIV/AIDs
infected and affected widows and
orphans), the Luo Council of elders,
Members of Parliament, Civil society
representatives ( Particularly CBOs),
Proffessionals from the Community,
Retired Community leaders ( men
and women), religious leaders, observers
from the provincial administration.This
was followed by a public Baraza
on 1st Dec 2004(World AIDs Day).
The organisers took note of the
fact that the theme for the 2004
World AIDs Day was Women and Girls.
 |
The
objective of the anticipated workshop
and public baraza in Kisumu (on
18-19/11/2004 and 1/12/2004 respectively)
was to principally give Luo widows
a forum to air their concerns (property
rights and inheritance) before a
gathering of Luo elders so that
constructive dialogue can be ignited
at the community level with a view
of looking into means and ways of
ameliorating the predicament of
these widows, who reportedly, are
habitually victimised by families
and in-laws.
Why
Luo widows? The focus was firstly
made on the Luo widows because,
despite the fact that 90% of Luos
are Christians, they, paradoxically,
stand out, among the Kenyan communities,
for having continued to be at the
forefront of religiously abiding
to traditional customs, many a times,
at the expense of their women's
(widows) (property) rights. The
quandary of the Luo widows has been
compounded by the HIV/AIDs pandemic,
which has in reality devastated
Luoland, leaving in its trail a
big number of widows, particularly
those in their 20s, who are by and
large the most vulnerable considering
that unlike their relatively older
counterparts, they are usually unprepared
for widowhood, financially and psychologically,
emotionally and physically.
Since many of these vulnerable women,
are unable to seek redress from
the mainstream justice system (mainly
because of lack of finances), there
is need to strengthen those cultural
safety nets that had, since time
immemorial, been used to redress
disputes in our traditional communities.
So, the structured cultural institutions
of authority such as the Luo's Ker
system; the Meru's Njuri Ncheke;
the Borana's Gada system should
not only be revitalised and supported,
but also made human rights-friendly.
Why? Because they will be cost-effective
and therefore more accessible to
all and unlike the adversarial system
of our courts, the mechanisms of
these traditional structures strove
to forge social harmony. Of note,
these cultural safety nets were
destroyed by the advent of concepts
such as capitalism. The concern,
therefore, is not that culture is
per se bad, but whether its implementation
affects women's property rights.
 |
The
activities with the Luo Community
were such a success and an eye opener
for all that attended the functions.
The following are some of the issues
that came to fore: